The registration link for next season is now active. Go fill it out ASAP.
Below are Faz's stats for the Summer 2022 season:
The registration link for next season is now active. Go fill it out ASAP.
Below are Faz's stats for the Summer 2022 season:
Spring 2023 Prop Bets
I don’t know about you guys, but I’m sick and tired of
seeing my face every time I check the Blog.
Thankfully, Luis has used the most recent handicap adjustment to prepare
some prop bets for the Spring 2023 Season* so we can bump my picture down to
the bottom of the webpage.
Adam Lynch - Over / Under Events Played: 5
Billy Dobbins - Over / Under Wins: 0.5
Brendan Donoghue - Owes at least 1 good pitcher: 20 to 1; Is on pace to owe a good pitcher and then double or triple bogeys the last three holes in a row and still wins by two strokes: 5 to 1
Brian Topor - Over /
Under Rounds under 100 (non concussion events only): 1.5
Casey Rease - Over /
Under new pieces of golf equipment in the bag to start the season: 1.5
Chandler Brown -
Finishes in the Top 4 of Season Standings: 3 to 1
Chris Fazioli - Wins
a tournament outright for the first time since 2018: 4 to 1
Chris Melberg -
Shoots gross even par or better on a non-concussion course: 20 to 1
Dan Rogers - Gives up
playing from the tips and “tees it forward” in all events: 100 to 1
Danny MacLean - Over
/ Under Rounds under 100 (non concussion events only): 1.5
Darren Broom - Gets
Major victory number 10: 15 to 1
Dave Harrington - Repeats as winner of the Classic at
Hernando Oaks to start the season: 12 to 1
Gary Brown - Wins the
Spring 2023 Season: 15 to 1
Geoff Leighly - Over
/ Under total Greenies, Long Drives and Sandies combined for the season: 7.5
John Webermeier: Issues
a formal apology for gross hypocrisy to all of the married Members and Members
with children that had to listen to his criticism over the years: 1,000 to 1
Josh Crum: Does not
owe a single bad pitcher for the entire season: 10 to 1
JW Ferguson - Finishes season with a handicap index below
his current 19.4: 3 to 1
Mike Gorecki - Over /
Under Birdies on the Season (Gross Birdies): 1.5
Mike Hauch - Finishes
season with a handicap index below his current 7.7: 1 to 1
Mike Oostenbrink - Plays
in the Hangover event on April 2 despite having a golf trip March 30 – April
2: 2 to 1. Attends the Hangover party on April 1st
despite having a golf trip in Orlando March 30 – April 2: 10 to 1.
Robert Reid - Wins the Spring 2023 Season: 12 to 1
Travis Netherton – Over / Under on total events played this first
season post wedding vows: 6.5
Troy Najour – Over / Under Long Drives on the Season: 2.5
Wasn't able to get one of these since Buchert skipped the final event. But here is your Summer 2022 Champion!
Champs dinner was a little light. Just how some people like it.
Good afternoon my FBGC friends! Several of you have received this in an email, but I thought it might be good to put it in a post in case I didn't have the correct email or was missing an email altogether. Chandler has already started the ball rolling with a donation, so big thanks to Dear Leader.
The USGA used to require we host non golf related Club events. Even though we aren’t under their tyrannical rule, we are having an official off-season outing this Friday - November 11th - at Red Dog. 8pm. Come out and bring your WAGs if you’d like to be social.
| Physical cash payouts are at the discretion of Dear Leader. |
Rapture 2022 Gambling Recap
It’s a very exciting time of year for professional
baseball. The MLB season is FINALLY
coming to a close and that means it is LIDOM time. That stands for the Liga de Beisbol Profesional
de la Republica Dominicana for the one or two of you out there that didn’t
already know. Anyway, last Friday I was
calling my favorite Caribbean sportsbook manager, Luis, with my picks for
opening weekend and I decided to check in to see how they fared with the big
upset in the Rapture 2022. Hopefully,
they didn’t take it on the chin too hard.
Luis said that the betting “action” was way down this
year. Something about missing not one,
but two Big JW’s in this year’s event.
There was a big wave of money when the Old Man House was announced, but
that was the only action of the week that caused any moves.
Overall, the sportsbook did quite well. I was somewhat surprised as it looked like
they had the Orange team winning 11 – 5.
Since there was very little betting on the event and they may not
continue to do odds on the event in the future, Luis let me in on some secrets
regarding how the odds were set and why the house almost always wins.
1.
All of the matches where one side was a -110 and
the other side was +100 were 50/50 matches in the eyes of the sportsbook. A small favorite is designated to help
generate interest, but ultimately they are coin flip matches. Either side should win about 50% of the
time. So how did the sportsbook pick a
favorite for the 10 of the 16 matches that were designated -110/+100? They flipped a coin.
2.
That left 6 matches that the sportsbook did not
consider coin flip matches. From most
lopsided odds to least lopsided odds, those matches were:
a.
Ho / Geoff: +150
Faz / Reid: -150
b.
Chandler / Geoff: -130
Casey / Gary: +120
c.
Ho: +120
Casey: -130
d.
Dave: -130
Danny: +110
e.
Ho / Darren: +110
Tall Mike / Troy: -120
f.
Darren / Brendan: -120
Gorecki
/ Danny: +110
Before
the event, I did notice one thing and pointed it out on the blog. Ho was considered an underdog in every match
despite having the lowest handicap in the league. I didn’t realize one thing going into the
Rapture that I later found interesting:
Geoff, Casey and Darren were all favored heavily in a match but also
considered heavy underdogs in another match.
I brought this up with Luis. He
wouldn’t give me the exact methodology used, but the sportsbook created a
Player Value Index (“PVI”) for each player.
The only times that the odds differed from a 50/50 match is when there
was a statistically significant difference in the individual PVI or combined
PVI for the teams. Just about anyone
could infer this from looking at the odds, but Luis confirmed that the two
lowest PVI’s belonged to Ho and Danny. 5
of the 6 non-coin flip matches had them as underdogs.
The
matchup of Chandler / Geoff -130 versus Casey / Gary +120, then jumped out at
me because it did not involve the lower end of the PVI. However, it did have Geoff going from a huge
underdog in Day 1 to a statistically significant favorite in Day 2. It also had Casey as a big underdog, whereas
Casey was a going to be a huge favorite in Day 3. Once again, Luis wouldn’t go into too much
detail, but he mentioned something about going from a low PVI partner to a high
PVI partner and also that an individual player’s PVI will change based on the
format being played. I guess what he was
telling me is that they think Geoff is better in the Four Ball format than he
is in Chapman and that having Chandler as a partner is much better than being
paired with Ho, at least for this year’s Rapture.
Maybe
this all seems obvious now, but is worth noting that the favorite won all
six of these matches. In events
like this, people like to bet on the underdog because they think they are
getting better value. After all, if the
handicap system was not flawed, then you would expect each team to have a 50%
chance of winning. If each team in these
six matches did in fact have a 50/50 chance of winning, then the odds that the
sportsbook would have gotten all six matches correct is roughly 1.56%.
One thing
I have noticed in the team golf events that I’ve played in is the winner and
loser is often determined by the bottom half of the draft, not the top. Everyone now knows that Dave picking Ho over
Gorecki was a huge mistake and it is interesting that the very last pick in the
draft seemed to have the biggest impact.
I know that captains often spend a lot of time fretting over who they
are going to pick first, especially in a snake draft. I don’t know if enough time is spent trying
to determine who should be picks 5 through 7.
![]() |
| Definitely the team with diverse 401(k)s. |
![]() |
| Looks like Green's van picked up their first child! |
Orange should have the three points needed to force a playoff. But some new shit had come to light behind my group:
![]() |
| Well deserved champions. |
![]() |
| A man who picks winners (and Danny). |
![]() |
| 2022 Rapture Participants |
We are still on. Update to follow once I have all the details booked. Which is going slow because I still don’t have power.
While many seasons blend together, for me the Summer 2022
Season will always be easy to remember as the Summer of Moostenbrink. I was able to play in six events and played all
six rounds with Tall Mike. It created a
special opportunity to extensively study the Moostie in the wild.
We all know the Moostie is a unique creature. Here is a little breakdown of his golf game
and what, in my opinion, has led to his success in the league.
Golf swing breakdown.
Mike is more of a picker than a compressor of the golf ball. Faz comes to mind as someone that is the
opposite. I would guess that the bottom
of Mike’s swing arc with iron shots is pretty much at impact rather than an
inch or two after the ball. This helps
explain why Mike is such a good iron player from the fairway, but struggles a
bit more from the rough. I also think
this is why he struggles somewhat out of greenside bunkers: it’s tough to
consistently “pick” the ball cleanly on short sand shots. His swing helps him hit up on the ball on tee
shots though. When he gets his 3 wood
working off the tee, he can string together a lot of good holes in a row.
I wonder how much of Mike’s swing is predicated on his back
issues and, therefore, whether swing changes would even be feasible. His swing speed really comes from the
gigantic arc that he can create given his height and long arms. He does not use his lower body to generate
much of his speed. If he created more
force with his lower body through the ground, this would help him generate more
swing speed and would also create a more descending blow at impact. It’s a tough balancing act though. A steeper angle at impact has its own faults
for amateur golfers (i.e. more fat shots and pull hooks). It would also create a lot more stress on his
back. It’s tough to imagine Tall Mike
making it through 18 holes if he tried to imitate Joaquin Niemann’s swing.
Another reason why I would hesitate to make any drastic
changes with Mike’s swing is the fact that he has shown the ability to greatly
improve his golf game with the swing he has in place. When Mike joined the League, he was around a
24 handicap and he is now a 16 handicap.
The only other player that I can think of that has managed to drop his
handicap that much is Mike Hauch.
Moving on to what has made Moostie successful in the League,
I think it really comes down to his level of commitment.
Mike is committed in three different ways. First, he is committed to the League itself. Despite having two kids and a wife that has to work some weekends, he plays in a good amount of events each season. If Mike misses an event, there was probably no legitimate way that he could have made it. Second, he commits as much time as he can to each event. Generally, Mike will get to the course early to get in a proper warm up and won't leave the range until he is ready. He doesn’t get distracted by silly things like being on the tee box when it is his Group’s turn to tee off. After all, there are four players in the Group. Standing on the box while the first three players tee off is a waste of valuable practice time. Third, he commits to each and every shot during a round. We mock the amount of time he stands over a putt, the amount of practice swings that he takes, and not pulling the trigger until he is 100% ready. However, how many strokes do you waste each round? If most of us thought about each and every shot and then committed to the shot itself, I think most of us would be able to shave a couple of strokes off our score each round without doing anything else to improve our games.
I
don’t think that it is coincidence that the two guys in the League that have
four Cups both have great attendance and also an appreciation for every shot
during a round. Winning an event often
comes down to one or two strokes. For
me, I typically make my bad swings on shots that are fairly easy. It’s generally on a wide open hole that I
completely block a drive or a straight forward, bump and run chip that I hit
fat. Those lapses in concentration add
up over a round and a season. I think
Chandler thinks his way around a golf course as well as anyone in the League,
but Moostie probably concentrates on every shot better than anyone.
1.
The putter pump fake. Have you ever seen another player line up
their putt, take their stance, address the ball, take their backswing… and then
stop? I guess sometimes you will see a
professional golfer stop and then step away and restart their process. Mike will stop mid backswing, bring the
putter back to the ball, and then will proceed to hit his putt sometimes a
second or two later and sometimes after 5 or 6 seconds of standing over the
ball. I have never seen anyone else do
that once, let alone at least once a round.
2.
The mid-round rolling on the ground knees to
chest stretching. Despite all the warm
up time, or perhaps because of it, you will undoubtedly see Mike laying on a tee
box at some point in the round rolling around on the ground trying to loosen up
his back.
3.
Trying to find the perfect practice swing. There are plenty of players that try to
visualize their shot before they hit it.
I have never seen someone try to mimic the perfect swing with their
practice swing though and continue to make practice swings until they find it. For me at least, it would be almost
impossible to make the exact same swing two times in a row. I don’t want to waste my good swing on the
practice swing and then step up to the ball, get half way through my backswing
or at the top of my swing, and realize that something is in a different
position than in my “perfect” swing. Without
needing a MRI machine, I think it’s safe to say that Tall Mike and Dustin
Johnson’s brain activity during a golf swing are going to be polar opposites.
Since most of you won't physically be at the draft on Saturday night... the results can be viewed here in not-so-real-time:
Draft Results:
Worst winning percentage:
Josh Crum: 0.00%
JW Ferguson: 2.83%
Brian Topor: 5.26%
Dan Rogers: 5.26%
Mike Hauch: 5.33%
Worst Career Earning:
JW Ferguson:
($553.87)
Danny MacLean: ($371.66)
Robert Reid: ($327.66)
Mike Gorecki: ($300.41)
Adam Lynch: ($300.11)
Worst Career Scoring Average:
Danny MacLean: 106.8
Mike Gorecki: 104.8
Brian Topor: 102.1
JW Ferguson: 101.5
Josh Crum: 100.9
This narrowed the list down to nine names. I went ahead and removed Adam, Reid, Hauch
and Dan, as their scoring averages are all under 100. Hauch might be (has to be?) the worst player
when it comes to Exhibition Scores compared to League Scores, but that post
will have to come at a later date.
Josh Crum: A lot of
Members have enjoyed immediate success upon joining the League, Crum is not one
of those people. He has yet to win, so he
has the lowest winning percentage at 0.00%.
He does not crack the top five in lowest career earnings, but that is
likely due to the small amount of events played. He probably holds the longest consecutive Bad
Pitcher Owed streak, but I’m not 100% sure on that. I think Big John had a great (awful?) streak
going at one time. He does have a few
stats going in his favor though when it comes to not being the worst player in
League history. His scoring average is
just over 100, which is significantly better than Gorecki and Danny Mac. His Greenie average is 0.43 and Long Drive
average is .22, which are very good compared to his competition.
JW Ferguson: This may
seem like the obvious choice based on the combination of win percentage, career
earnings, and the fact that he has the longest losing streak in League
history. However, he also has some
things he can point to make a good case that he isn’t the worst player. His scoring average, Greenie average (.38),
and Long Drive average (.26) are better than Gorecki and Danny Mac.
Brian Topor: Like
Crum, Topor has not logged a large number of events (19 total). He has managed to get one victory and it was
a Major. He also has the highest Greenie
average in this group (0.57), so I think it is safe to remove his name from
consideration given the small sample size.
Danny MacLean: I was
somewhat surprised to see that Danny Mac had the worst Scoring Average in the
League (106.8). Not only is it the worst
average, but it is the worst by a full two shots (Gorecki: 104.8). I haven’t played many rounds with Danny, but
I don’t think he has a terrible golf swing and was surprised by the Scoring
Average and low Greenie average (.25).
He also has the second worst Career Earnings. I hate to say it, but his stats make a good
case for being the worst.
Last, but maybe not the Worst, Mike Gorecki: If we were asked to immediately name the
worst golfer in the League, I think we have all been brainwashed to immediately
respond with Gorecki. However, there are
quite a few stats that Gorecki could point out to make his argument that he
isn’t the worst. His win percentage
(8.5%) is head and shoulders above his competition. In fact, he has more wins than the other four
guys on this list have combined. He also
does not have the worst Scoring Average or Greenie average (.30 compared to
Danny’s .25). He has finished second in
the Season Standings multiple times and has the most memorable/heartbreaking
second place finish in League history.
One thing that does not show up in the stats that I have to
bring up though is the fact that Gorecki has the only swing in the League that
negatively impacts my score. If I am in
Gorecki’s group, I have trouble making solid contact with the golf ball by the
time I get to the back nine. Whereas you
watch Melberg’s swing and you wonder how he ever hits a bad shot, you watch
Gorecki’s swing and sometimes wonder how the ball even advances. I took advice from Irish Dave and I will
literally not watch him take practice swings or hit the ball as much as
possible. I am not surprised that he has
a much better match play record than the other guys on this list due to the
negative impact he can have on his opponent.
I don’t know how to factor this into his ranking, but it is something
that separates him from the rest.
Despite the fact that these guys all really suck at golf,
I’m glad they are in the League and hope they know that they make the rest of
us feel a little better about our own golf games. If I had to assign an order, I think I would
go 1. Danny Mac, 2. JW,
3. Gorecki, 4.
Crum, 5. Topor. I would give Gorecki some credit for the fact
that he has so many more wins than everyone else and I would give Crum some
slack based on the small number of events played.
The Greatest Golfer in Club History
I plan on posting a few times on the Blog this off-season
just to keep the #content train rolling since we won’t have any posts on
upcoming events or recaps. I usually
have some free time in the morning before my daughter wakes up. One of the things I do while having a cup of
coffee is check the Blog for any updates or new posts. 99% of the content that we have on the Blog
is from Chandler and, while I thank him for his time and dedication to the
League, I also feel like the rest of us could be contributing more.
I have written a few things over the last two weeks, but
most of them have to do with me and my golf game. I did not intentionally set out to do this,
but I just didn’t play a lot of golf with most of the people in the League this
past season. I played six rounds and was
matched up with Tall Mike all six times, Faz and Topor three times (I think),
and Troy twice. For a few of those
rounds, we either had a threesome or had a guest playing as the fourth. It is hard to write about someone else’s golf
game when you did not get to see them play.
I would love to be able to do a breakdown of what has
happened to Gary’s golf game, but I have not been fortunate enough to witness that train wreck firsthand. I do have
a write up for Tall Mike though that I hope you all will find entertaining.
However, since most of the content is going to be tied to me
in some way, I wanted to kick things off with a post that has nothing to do
with me and that is:
The League has been in existence for 10 years, who is the
greatest golfer in League history?
To start things off, I want to clarify that I would consider
the Greatest Golfer in League History and the Greatest Champion in League
History two different things. (Don’t
worry, I have a separate post written to break down the Greatest Champion in
League History.) The Greatest Golfer in
League History could be the same person as the Greatest Champion in League
History, but that does not have to be the case.
As our League uses an
imperfect system to try to level the playing field between golfers of different
skill levels, the best player is not always going to be the Champion at the end
of a season. Furthermore, the best
golfer at a given moment in time is not necessarily the greatest golfer in
League history. Tom Brady does not win
the MVP every year, but he is considered by most to be the GOAT. His sustained excellence has separated him from
his peers. I don’t think that we have a
Tom Brady of the League; someone that has separated himself from other players
in the league to such a degree that there is no longer room for a meaningful discussion. If we did, this would be a very short
post. So here are the contenders, in no
specific order, and I’m interested to see if there is a consensus as to who
should be considered the Greatest Golfer in League History:
1. Chandler Brown.
The argument for why he should be considered the greatest is rock solid. He has the most events played, most wins,
most 2nd place finishes, a scoring average of 85.6, the most
Greenies, the most Long Drives, the most Sandies, and four Championships. He is like the Kareem Abdul-Jabbar of our
League. His longevity and sustained
excellence really stands out when you compare his stats to the rest of the
League. Are some of his numbers inflated
due to the first few seasons of the League when we had less Members? Sure they are. That is the reason why there is room for
debate when it comes down to Chandler or one of the guys listed below. His win percentage is 11.7%, he averages 1.05
Greenies per round, and his Long Drive win percentage is 29.7%. His match play record is a very respectable
16-8-4.
2. Mike Oostenbrink. He has the most Modern Era Championships
(four), 6 Majors (just one less than Chandler), and has the most epic
Championship in League history when he won the final two events of the Summer
2020 Season to steal the Cup away from Gorecki.
He has done this playing in 128 events, which is 60 less events than
Chandler has played in. However, his
scoring average is 94.3, his win percentage is 10.1%, Greenies per round is
0.77, and Long Drive win percentage is 18%.
In my opinion, Tall Mike is like the Robert Horry of the League. He has some of the most clutch performances
and shots that we will remember forever, but nobody is going to say he was a
better player than the greats of that era:
Jordan, Kobe, Duncan, etc.
3. Dave Harrington.
Irish Dave has a scoring average of 83.5 and he has put up that average
while playing many rounds from a harder set of tees. Comparing Dave to Chandler and Tall Mike is
not an apples to apples comparison.
Dave’s Greenies per round is 1.11, which is better than Tall Mike and Chandler’s
averages, but how much “extra credit” should Dave get due to the fact that he
wins those Greenies from one or two sets of tee boxes farther back then the
rest of the guys in his group? As far as
Long Drive, his win percentage is 27.3% and is better than Chandler and Tall
Mike. Once again, he is doing that while
giving up yardage to the rest of his group (usually). He also has a great match play record of
15-5-2. His win percentage is 9.4%,
which is lower than Chandler and Tall Mike.
I don’t know if that can be blamed on tee boxes. He also only has half as many wins as
Chandler (11 compared to 22). Dave is
like Giannis or Michael Jordan, where the stats alone are great but somehow do
not tell the whole story.
4.
Chris Melberg.
Melberg has only played in 34 events, so he has not had time to collect
the same career stats as the other guys on this list. Nonetheless, his short time in the League has
already produced some numbers that put him in consideration as the
greatest. He has the lowest scoring
average at 82.6. He has the lowest gross
score to par in League history when he went -6 at Southport Springs. His match play record is excellent,
5-0-1. He averages 1.14 Greenies per
round. His Long Drive win percentage is
20.6%. Like Irish Dave, he has played
many of his rounds from a harder tee box than everyone else in his group. Despite his low handicap index, his win percentage
is still a respectable 8.8%. To switch
up the sports as far as his comparison, I would say he’s kind of like Chargers
QB Justin Herbert. His stats from his
first few seasons are comparable to the best of all time. However, he has yet to win a Championship and
just hasn’t had enough time to rack up the career statistics that some other
guys have.
Some people were left off the top contenders list and here
is why:
5.
Dan Rogers:
His scoring average is 85.0, but that is more than 2 shots worse than
Melberg. Dan and Melberg have very
comparable stats, but Melberg’s scoring average gave him the advantage.
6.
Darren Broom.
He has the most Majors and a great win percentage (13%). His scoring average is 94.0 though. Tall Mike has a similar scoring average (94.3)
and has double the Cups. He got the nod
over The Baron.
7.
Faz, Gary and Reid: These three guys have all racked up an
impressive amount of wins, Greenies and Long Drives. However, they do not stack up well when
compared to Chandler’s stats and their scoring averages are higher as well.
The rest of you (myself included) do not deserve a mention.
To be honest, when I started writing this, I thought
Chandler would blow everyone away. I
didn’t realize how great of a ball striker Irish Dave is until I started
looking at his Greenies per round and Long Drive win percentage. I think it’s very close between those two
guys right now and if we check back in another 10 years, Melberg will probably
be right there with them.
There are two charity scrambles coming up in the off season that I wanted to give some attention to.
The first is the Shriners one that didn't happen last year. Frankly, it seems to be on a bad day for us since it is right after the Rapture on October 10th. I have golf bachelor party the weekend after that, too. So I probably should be responsible and work that Monday and not golf 7/10 days and keep it at six. But I figured I would post it here if anyone one was interested. It i at River Hills in Valrico.
The second is for the Humane Society on Monday, November 14th at Carrollwood CC. I can make that one.
They are both $800 for a foursome which includes two meals, drinks and probably the usual swag and silent auctions. I bet the Humane Society will have puppies, which is always nice.
Humane Society @ Carrollwood CC