As you may have heard,
handicaps are changing for 2020. We'll officially no longer be... official... since we won't be tied into the new USGA system/database.
The goal is to get "official" at some point, but in the meantime
we're going rogue!
 |
| It's gonna be nuts. |
I'll implement as many of the changes as possible, and we should ultimately be good enough for government work.
Bottom line: in our tournaments you're going to get a number... you're going to play to that number... and you're going to like it.
Most of you can stop reading now.
Anyone who wants to know how the sausage is going to be made, continue below:
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 3.1(a) now states that when establishing a handicap, the max score you can take is par + 5. Coincidentally, this is what our Board of Directors implemented over a year ago.
Action: Great job voting in a Board that's ahead of the times. Again, this only applies to
handicap establishment. Once you have an Index, you get to deal with the bullshit in the next section.
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 3.1(b) changes your max allowed for
handicap reporting. While it was based on the ESC grid, the new number is "
net double bogey".
Action: Your Club Chairman handles this adjustment after each
tournament round. It's on YOU to report your adjusted scores correctly during non-tournament rounds. This requires you to look at the hole-handicaps on the scorecard and decide if you made worse than "net double bogey," and then adjust accordingly. It's a huge pain in the ass. And most of you probably weren't reporting your ESC rounds anyway. We'll hammer this more later once next season has started.
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 4.1 says you must submit your rounds IMMEDIATELY after play. This is due to your Handicap Index now changing DAILY, instead of BI-MONTHLY (Rule 5.4).
Action: We are NOT going to change how often your "DPT/FBGC Index" is updated. Ain't nobody got time for that... until we're on an automated platform. So for now, two updates a month per usual.
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 5.2(a) changes how many rounds are used in your Index calculation. Currently, it uses the average of your best 10 of previous 20 differentials, with a 4% reduction. The NEW RULE uses the average of your best
eight differentials of the previous 20 (with no additional reduction).
Action: We'll be able to implement this change, and for most people it'll only change your Index a few tenths. If you have a wide spread of scores, it'll probably lower you down a point. And a the super high handicaps might actually gain points since the 4% reduction was pretty large up in the bad golfer stratosphere.
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 5.3 increases the maximum allowed Index to 54.0.
Action: I mean... sure. But if you ever sniff a number that high... you probably shouldn't be playing golf for score/points/money.
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 5.6 applies extra adjustments to your Index based on "playing conditions." The process requires crowd-sourcing scores at a specific course for a specific day, and determining if the reported scores are out of whack.
Action: It's impossible for us to implement this change. Also, it's not going to change your differential very often. The BEST thing this will do is alert the USGA when a course is incorrectly rated (ie: players consistently reporting low net scores like at ChampionsGate CC). How quickly that causes a course to pay their own money for a re-rating is yet to be seen. They're only required to do it once every 10 years unless there are major architectural changes.
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 5.8 determines how HIGH your Index can increase over a 12-month period. It compares every revision to your LOWEST Index in the last year. That Index can never increase more than 5 points. And there's a soft-cap that slows any increase after it reaches 3 points above your "lowest index" in the previous 12-months.
Action: This was a huge pain in the ass, but I got it implemented. I don't see the "hard cap" coming into play very often... but starting in January 2020... Gary and John are already in the "soft cap" zone. Sandbaggers!
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 5.9 deals with
exceptional scores. If you ever record a round where the calculated differential is 7+ lower than your Index... you get a -1 point reduction in your previous 20 round differentials. If you ever record a round 10+ lower... it's a -2 point reduction. And if you ever do it more than once, the application is cumulative. This is the ultimate sandbagger penalty, and it WOULD affect some of us from time to time. Like when Adam shot an 85 at Buffalo Creek despite having a 21.8 Index (he won by 8 strokes).
Action: A complete nightmare using the duct-tape that makes up this blog. But for the most part, we're ready to roll on this.
--------------------------
New Rule: Handicap Rule 6.1 changes how Course Handicaps are calculated. Currently, an extra calculation is only done if players are on DIFFERENT TEES. This is something we weren't doing correctly in our early existence... and then ultimately figured out when we started allowing you to pick your own tee boxes. Turns out, the USGA is tired of people ignoring this extra step (Darryl). So now...
YOU HAVE TO APPLY IT TO EVERY TEE BOX ALL THE TIME!
Good luck explaining how to do this to the masses. Anyway...
It causes a few things... 1) par now matters, since that's the basis for the adjustment 2) your Course Handicap for any given day is definitely going to be different than before.
The net result won't affect our Club events in terms of
where you will finish on the leader board. But it WILL cause
more bad pitchers to be purchased, since most of us have rightfully embraced the "tee it forward" initiative. The tees that are "correct" for us are usually easy for Scratch Golfers, which is the basis for the Course Rating.
Action: Rounds that were net +8 or +9 are now going to be in the Pitcher Zone. Faz will be able to do average pitchers per round comparison, but if we continue to rack up "owed pitchers" expect the Board to take action against the deadbeats.